Fast fact: it's been nine years since a Chicago Bulls player has played in the NBA's All-Star game. The player's name? Michael Jordan. The year? 1998, his last in a Bulls uniform.
While it's true that the current incarnation of the Chicago Bulls have become successful in recent years despite not having a superstar like Jordan in its roster, their horrible start this season (an NBA Eastern Conference-worst at 3-10) begs the question, can an NBA team win without a superstar?
Conventional Wisdom
The NBA is full of conventional wisdomisms, some of which have been disproved, while others reinforced, over time. They say, for example, that defense wins championships, and that has pretty much been proven repeatedly over the years. Try naming an NBA champion that couldn't lock down its opponent, and you'll find that it's a rather difficult task.
On the flip side, there was once this CW that one couldn't win an NBA championship without a great big man, or big men, and looking at the NBA champions of the 80's, one would be hard-pressed to disagree. The LA Lakers had Kareem Abdul-Jabar; the Boston Celtics had Robert Parish and Kevin McHale; the Philadelphia 76ers had Moses Malone; the Detroit Pistons had a gang of quality big men in Bill Laimbeer, Dennis Rodman, John Salley, and James Edwards.
But Michael Jordan's Chicago Bulls teams disproved this by winning six championships with less than stellar––albeit serviceable––centers like Bill Cartwright, Luc Longley, Bill Wennington, and Will Perdue.
Today, there are more CWs that are being challenged, i.e., the Phoenix Suns' small-ball, run-and-gun approach questioning the notion that this approach to the game can't reap dividends in June. As the NBA's rules change, and as players evolve, there's no doubt that every CW in the book is going to be thrown out in our lifetimes.
Except maybe one: you can't win big without a superstar.
No Go-to Guy
ESPN Sports' John Hollinger has an insightful look at the Chicago Bulls' recent troubles, but as far as I'm concerned, it all boils down to the fact that no one wants to step up on that team. Yeah, they have budding stars in Luol Deng and Ben Gordon, the operative word here being "budding." But it's obvious that despite their improving play that neither player is at a level where they can take over the game and will their team to victory.
The woes of the Bulls, Hollinger points out, starts with the offense. In a nutshell: everyone stinks. Kirk Hinrich. Andres Nocioni. Chris Duhon. Ben Wallace. Tyrus Thomas. EVERYONE.
And on a team that used to pride itself on the whole being greater than the sum of its parts, the terrible performances of its players are going to sink the team, and it doesn't matter if they're playing a contender or a cellar-dweller.
The Bulls need someone with the talent and consequently, the right, to call everyone out and tell them to start playing some decent ball. At this point, trading its "star" players for Kobe Bryant doesn't seem like a bad idea, but the way they're playing, it's almost a given that Kobe'll nix that deal.
If they can't get a superstar, someone has to start playing like one. It may be Deng or it may be Gordon; right now, it doesn't matter who it is. What does matter is that whoever he is, he's got to step up now, or the Bulls are going to miss the playoffs and make Chicago residents wish they were back in 1998.
While it's true that the current incarnation of the Chicago Bulls have become successful in recent years despite not having a superstar like Jordan in its roster, their horrible start this season (an NBA Eastern Conference-worst at 3-10) begs the question, can an NBA team win without a superstar?
Conventional Wisdom
The NBA is full of conventional wisdomisms, some of which have been disproved, while others reinforced, over time. They say, for example, that defense wins championships, and that has pretty much been proven repeatedly over the years. Try naming an NBA champion that couldn't lock down its opponent, and you'll find that it's a rather difficult task.
On the flip side, there was once this CW that one couldn't win an NBA championship without a great big man, or big men, and looking at the NBA champions of the 80's, one would be hard-pressed to disagree. The LA Lakers had Kareem Abdul-Jabar; the Boston Celtics had Robert Parish and Kevin McHale; the Philadelphia 76ers had Moses Malone; the Detroit Pistons had a gang of quality big men in Bill Laimbeer, Dennis Rodman, John Salley, and James Edwards.
But Michael Jordan's Chicago Bulls teams disproved this by winning six championships with less than stellar––albeit serviceable––centers like Bill Cartwright, Luc Longley, Bill Wennington, and Will Perdue.
Today, there are more CWs that are being challenged, i.e., the Phoenix Suns' small-ball, run-and-gun approach questioning the notion that this approach to the game can't reap dividends in June. As the NBA's rules change, and as players evolve, there's no doubt that every CW in the book is going to be thrown out in our lifetimes.
Except maybe one: you can't win big without a superstar.
No Go-to Guy
ESPN Sports' John Hollinger has an insightful look at the Chicago Bulls' recent troubles, but as far as I'm concerned, it all boils down to the fact that no one wants to step up on that team. Yeah, they have budding stars in Luol Deng and Ben Gordon, the operative word here being "budding." But it's obvious that despite their improving play that neither player is at a level where they can take over the game and will their team to victory.
The woes of the Bulls, Hollinger points out, starts with the offense. In a nutshell: everyone stinks. Kirk Hinrich. Andres Nocioni. Chris Duhon. Ben Wallace. Tyrus Thomas. EVERYONE.
And on a team that used to pride itself on the whole being greater than the sum of its parts, the terrible performances of its players are going to sink the team, and it doesn't matter if they're playing a contender or a cellar-dweller.
The Bulls need someone with the talent and consequently, the right, to call everyone out and tell them to start playing some decent ball. At this point, trading its "star" players for Kobe Bryant doesn't seem like a bad idea, but the way they're playing, it's almost a given that Kobe'll nix that deal.
If they can't get a superstar, someone has to start playing like one. It may be Deng or it may be Gordon; right now, it doesn't matter who it is. What does matter is that whoever he is, he's got to step up now, or the Bulls are going to miss the playoffs and make Chicago residents wish they were back in 1998.